Disadvantaged students suffer as new subject ‘cold spots’ develop

Shrinking humanities departments reducing options for those who wish to study close to home, finds British Academy

November 20, 2024
Source: iStock/robas

Arts and humanities provision is at risk of “death by a thousand cuts”, with disadvantaged young people in particular becoming increasingly cut off from studying certain subjects, the British Academy has warned.

A map showing how “cold spots” have developed across the UK over the past decade has been created by the UK’s national academy for the humanities and social sciences to raise the alarm about the impact of shrinking options.

It shows that large parts of the country now contain few or no universities offering subjects such as theology, anthropology and languages, particularly when institutions with higher entry grades are excluded, echoing concerns that these fields are becoming the preserve of the elite.


Creating internship opportunities: showing employers the value in humanities and social sciences


Given that students from disadvantaged backgrounds are more likely to want to study close to home and tend to get lower grades, the changes mean that those looking to study these subjects often face a choice between travelling further afield or turning away from higher education in general.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There was a fear that nobody had been monitoring the big picture of all the individual decisions across the sector around closing departments, running redundancy schemes or merging different courses or schools,” said Sarah Cowan, head of higher education and research policy at the British Academy.

“We were becoming increasingly concerned we would end up in a ‘death by a thousand cuts’ situation. In five or 10 years’ time, someone would say: ‘How did we end up here? We’ve got no provision in this subject or if you live here you can’t study this.’

ADVERTISEMENT

“There is a lot of focus already at the level of individual subjects or individual institutions, but we wanted to make sure somebody was monitoring the overall trends in subject provision, in order to be aware of the risks.”

The map – which draws on a decade of data from the Higher Education Statistics Agency – shows that there was a contraction in the geographical spread in language courses in 2022 compared with 2011. For example, for French, cold spots have developed in large parts of eastern England and the south-east. Provision of subjects such as finance, law and sociology has grown in the same period.

Ms Cowan said the findings should be of note to the current government, with its focus on widening participation, as it presents a “worrying picture of who gets to go to university”.

For institutions, she said, the map showed the need to explore new models such as sharing resources and staffing, to ensure that subjects do not disappear entirely in the UK.

ADVERTISEMENT

tom.williams@timeshighereducation.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Humanities ‘cold spots’ freeze out disadvantaged

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Anglophone scepticism about the value of language study had been rising for many years before anyone had heard of Duolingo or ChatGPT. But while some academics believe technology will kill off universities’ remaining language departments, others dare to hope it will be their saviour. Patrick Jack reports

25 April

Reader's comments (6)

Self-selecting oligarchy speaks out on behalf of the less advantaged. Liberalism at its finest. Fellow of the Brutish Academy
Times Higher reader speaks out on behalf of the working class. Socialism at its finest. (So what part of their report do you object to, apart from all of it?)
In my experience the administrators at the BA are ver aware of these issues and genuinely serious and concerned about getting beyond the academic elite. Unfortunately, in many cases their hands are tied by a very conservative and defensive Fellowship, more of a gerontocracy than an oligarchy in many respects. The governance is in sore need of reform and Fellowship terms should be limited I my view. But the body that needs to approve the reforms is the body that holds on to power. It's very bad and I think all off us, whether liberal, socialist, progressive etc should be pushing for the Academy's reform, and if it resists cut off it's finance and give the money to the AHRC, where there is sone accountability.
A few years ago I had a conversation with the Chairperson or whether he was called at the BA about these things. He agreed completely but just said that the Fellows as a body were extremely conservative and veto-ed anything that sounded like reform. He told me the Classicists and the Medievalists were the worst in this regard and that just wanted to ,hold on to power and keep the barbarians out. He was very honest. He's long gone now and things may have changed. AI think the number Fellowships are limited and last for a lifetime? Is that still true. If not please correct me. But really, it's a self-perpetuating elite, we all know that, despite the apparently liberal and progressive ethos of our profession.
I agree with that totally. It's a real scandal and nothing is ever done about it. However, I do feel the Academy does good work and that it produces some excellent and helpful reports. It has defended the Humanities ably on many occasions and seems to have influence with the powers that be (though maybe more with Conservative governments). So I think it's 'two chhers' for the BA from me overall.
The House of Lords. The Church of England. The British Academy.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT